Donald Rumsfeld sez: “we fight with the Finder we have, not the Finder we want to have.”
Finder is the OS X file manager. It is essentially useless. Grievances against the Finder range from the aesthetic (brushed metal; ugly colored labels) to its oddball interaction design (modal icon, list, or column views; unsound importance of the oval toolbar button) to technical (lack of recovery from a disconnected network share; .DS_Store file pollution). This is just a random sampling; any Mac person will have his or her own list of questionable Finder behaviors.
Over the last few releases of OS X, Finder has changed, but it hasn’t improved: hence FTFF, a slogan coined at Ars Technica.
If you don’t want to wait for Apple to fix the Finder, there are some alternatives (from best to worst):
- muCommander — an excellent open source Norton Commander style file manager, cross-platform yet reasonably Mac-like;
- Liquifile — a clean zooming interface that works best with deeply hierarchical directory structures ($10 USD);
- Learn bash;
- Finder, with icons arranged in a sine wave; or
- Path Finder — a bulky, overcomplicated proprietary Finder clone, not recommended ($35 USD).
For everyday work, I use Finder in column view, with four columns and a floating information palette (⌥⌘I) as the “fifth column.” For anything more complicated, find and xargs are starting points.
(tags: design feedback-loop mac)